[USRP-users] N200 vs. N210 differences

Mike McLernon Mike.McLernon at mathworks.com
Tue Sep 25 07:57:30 EDT 2012

Yes, the basic MATLAB/Simulink interface to UHD should work with the N200.


From: sivan.toledo at gmail.com [mailto:sivan.toledo at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Sivan Toledo
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 3:59 AM
To: Mike McLernon
Cc: usrp-users at lists.ettus.com
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] N200 vs. N210 differences

Thanks Mike. Yes, I noticed that the API to extract the GPS timing and GPS sentences from the GPSDO is present in the UHD API but not in the Matlab API. We'll figure out what to do once we get the equipment and start writing code for it.

But the basic Matlab/Simulink interface to UHD should work with the N200, right?
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Mike McLernon <Mike.McLernon at mathworks.com<mailto:Mike.McLernon at mathworks.com>> wrote:
Hi Sivan,

MathWorks has not tested GPSDO with the N210 or N200.


From: usrp-users-bounces at lists.ettus.com<mailto:usrp-users-bounces at lists.ettus.com> [mailto:usrp-users-bounces at lists.ettus.com<mailto:usrp-users-bounces at lists.ettus.com>] On Behalf Of Sivan Toledo
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 10:26 AM
To: usrp-users at lists.ettus.com<mailto:usrp-users at lists.ettus.com>
Subject: [USRP-users] N200 vs N210 differences

Are there any differences between the N200 and the N210 beyond the larger FPGA? The features that are important to me are the Matlab/Simulink interface (I think that the Mathworks documentation only promises that the driver works with the N210) and the GPSDO integration. Will these two things work with both models?

Thanks, Sivan

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ettus.com/pipermail/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com/attachments/20120925/6dfc08ab/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the USRP-users mailing list